The Rightous mind: why polotics and religion make people divide by Johnothan
“Morality binds and blinds.”
Why Do Good People Disagree So Much?
Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind is one of those books that doesn’t just make you think—it forces you to reconsider everything you thought you understood about morality, politics, and human nature. If you’ve ever found yourself frustrated by political debates, baffled by someone else’s moral values, or just curious about why people seem so irrationally divided, this book is essential reading.
Haidt, a social psychologist, sets out to answer a deceptively simple question: Why do good people, with good intentions, have such deeply conflicting moral and political beliefs? The result is a fascinating deep dive into moral psychology, evolutionary theory, and the hidden forces that shape our opinions.
Moral Psychology: The Elephant and the Rider
One of Haidt’s most compelling ideas is the "elephant and rider" metaphor, which describes how our moral judgments work. The rider represents our reasoning mind, the part of us that likes to think we’re rational, logical beings who carefully weigh evidence before forming beliefs. The elephant, however, is our intuitive, emotional self—the part that actually makes decisions before the rider even has a chance to justify them.
Haidt argues that moral reasoning is mostly post hoc justification—our instincts and gut feelings (the elephant) make snap judgments, and then our rational minds (the rider) scramble to defend them. This explains why moral and political debates so often feel frustrating: people aren’t swayed by logic alone because their intuitions are already set in stone.
This idea is both frustrating and freeing. It’s frustrating because it suggests that simply presenting facts to someone won’t necessarily change their mind. But it’s freeing because it helps us understand why debates feel so futile—and how to have better, more productive conversations.
The Six Moral Foundations: Why Liberals and Conservatives See the World Differently
Another groundbreaking idea in The Righteous Mind is Moral Foundations Theory, which explains how different people prioritize different moral values. Haidt outlines six core moral foundations:
- Care/Harm – Protecting others, preventing suffering.
- Fairness/Cheating – Justice, equality, and proportionality.
- Loyalty/Betrayal – Group loyalty, patriotism, tribal bonds.
- Authority/Subversion – Respect for tradition, leadership, social order.
- Sanctity/Degradation – Purity, sacredness, religious and cultural values.
- Liberty/Oppression – Resistance to tyranny, personal freedom.
Liberals tend to focus primarily on Care and Fairness, seeing harm and injustice as the biggest moral threats. Conservatives, on the other hand, value all six foundations more equally, placing more emphasis on Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity—which explains why they often see liberal values as weak or naive.
This framework does an excellent job of explaining why people talk past each other in political and religious debates. It’s not just that they disagree on policies; they’re operating on fundamentally different moral playing fields.
What I Loved About This Book
✅ Haidt doesn’t push a political agenda. While he started out as a liberal, his research forced him to acknowledge the strengths of conservative and libertarian moral perspectives. This makes the book feel balanced and fair.
✅ It makes you more empathetic. Understanding why people believe what they do makes it easier to engage with them rather than dismiss them. If you’ve ever struggled to understand why your conservative uncle or your progressive coworker sees the world so differently, this book provides real insight.
✅ It’s full of real-world applications. Whether you’re interested in psychology, politics, religion, or just improving your communication skills, The Righteous Mind offers practical takeaways that can help you navigate difficult conversations.
What I Didn’t Love
❌ Some sections feel repetitive. Haidt’s ideas are fascinating, but he tends to drive home the same points multiple times, which can make certain parts drag.
❌ Not everyone will like his conclusions. If you’re deeply committed to a particular ideology, you might find some of Haidt’s arguments challenging—or even frustrating. He’s not trying to "take sides," but in doing so, he sometimes alienates both conservatives and liberals.
If You Liked This, Read…
📖 Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman – If you loved the "elephant and rider" metaphor, Kahneman’s work on cognitive biases and decision-making is a must-read.
📖 The Coddling of the American Mind by Jonathan Haidt & Greg Lukianoff – A follow-up to The Righteous Mind, this book examines how moral psychology affects education, free speech, and the rise of "safety culture."
📖 Why We’re Polarized by Ezra Klein – If you want a more politically focused deep dive into why American politics is so divided, Klein’s book is a great companion read.
Final Verdict: 9/10 – A Must-Read for Understanding Human Morality
The Righteous Mind is one of the most thought-provoking books I’ve ever read. Whether you agree with Haidt’s conclusions or not, his research forces you to step outside your ideological bubble and truly understand why good people disagree so deeply. If you want to become a better thinker, communicator, and listener, this book is an essential addition to your reading list.
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (9/10)
Have you read The Righteous Mind? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!
MORE:
Comments
Post a Comment